|
E-TYRANTS
for
EGO MAGAZINE
[click
for small article scan]
While web-savvy 20-somethings
around the country are making millions when
their dot-coms go public, other sites –
especially non-profits – are being
bullied to "go private." Deep-pocket
corporations from Etoys to California HMO
HealthNet are trying to usurp domain names
already registered to other organizations.
Claiming that addresses like etoy.com (a
guerrilla art site) and healthnet.org (a
non-profit hub for medics in developing
countries) will lure away and bewilder would-be
buyers, the e-tyrants are trying to sue
the thrift-shop pants off these penniless
folks. It's illegal (domain names are first-come,
first-served), it's nasty, and in some cases
flat-out comical. Toys-'R'-Us is suing the
satirical site Roadkills-R-Us because its
name might "confuse" the toy seller’s
customers. (Anyone who can’t tell
a flattened raccoon from a Furby probably
should not be operating a computer anyway.)
The Web may be the media’s wild frontier,
but such profiteer-versus-pioneer battles
are anything but virgin soil: technology
breeds a new form of communication; despite
initial doubts about its potential, the
new medium booms in popularity; within a
few years, its primary use changes from
educational to commercial; advertising,
once banned, is now frequent; private companies
muscle in and decide “what is best
for the public”; expensive trials
and buy-outs eventually squeeze out all
but the big-bucks businesses. Much of this
scenario may be as familiar to your grandmother
as it is to you. It’s the history
of early radio – and if companies
get their way, it will be the way of the
Web as well.
Few remember or even know that the Internet
was once a conduit for research papers and
cyber-geek chitchat. Advertising and for-profit
sites were prohibited for the same reason
radio commercials were: “It was inconceivable
that we should allow so great an opportunity
to be drowned in advertising chatter,”
as President J. Edgar Hoover put it back
in the early ‘20s. Politicians, publishers
and the public all deplored the idea of
businesses peddling themselves on the airwaves.
But with American consumerism being the
behemoth it is, radio went from a public
service to a private goldmine in only two
years (1922-24). By then, Hoover had changed
his tune and relegated the charter programs
like adult education to daytime slots on
smalltime stations. The big channels –
50,000 watts or more – were handed
out to AT&T, Westinghouse and GE. Soon
the fat cats asserted that they had the
“right to take over” other stations
because they could put them to better use.
If non-profits or the public wanted an hour
of airtime, they could just buy it from
the big guys. What was touted as a democratic
system with the public interest in mind
was really more of an oligopoly.
Flash forward to the millennium, where
Web tycoons are hurling bribes (if you’re
lucky) and threats (if you’re not)
at small-time Web masters – forcing
them to scrape together legal fees and,
in some cases, close their sites. Network
Solutions (the Internet’s domain-name
gatekeepers) bowed to threats from Etoys
(www.etoys.com) and shut down etoy.com in
December 1999 even though there was no legal
reason to do so. The artists’ site
was online at etoy.com in 1995, two years
before Etoys even existed. The plight of
Satellife, good Samaritans who run the healthnet.org
domain, is even more galling. Healthnet.org
was up and running back in ’93 –
the Stone Age of the World Wide Web. The
HMO HealthNet, which launched two sites
in ’96 (www.healthnet.com; www.healthnet.net),
wants the healthnet.org address as well.
Not only is the HMO three years late in
its request (strike one), but it is also
barred, as all for-profit companies are,
from using the “.org” suffix
(strike two). The final blow? Healthnet.org
is a site that connects medical pros around
the globe who otherwise would be incapable
of communicating. Changing its domain name
would alter the e-mail addresses of all
of its participants (so-and-so@healthnet.org)
and leave many stranded on the info-superhighway.
Other suits of the Roadkills-R-Us variety
are worthy of several snickers – and
nothing else – but their victims aren’t
exactly laughing. An Air Force technical
sergeant with the unfortunate name Don Henley
registered his site – www.donhenley.com
– only to be badgered by the like-named
singer and his representation. ReelUniverse.com
got a nasty note from Reel.com, which claims
it has the right to any domain name containing
“reel.” (There are currently
about 20 such sites, from reeldeals.com
to thereelsite.com.).
While such tales might encourage mail bombs
or brick-through-window incidents, there
are better ways of dealing with the injustices
– and the web-wise have found them.
Radio may have lost its fight against the
balance sheet, but the Internet’s
very structure will save it from the same
fate. Only big money had access to big stations,
but with the Web, it’s as easy to
dial up www.podunk.com as it is Yahoo or
Amazon. It doesn’t matter how rich
you are or where you live – if you
have a modem, you can create a popular Web
site. Radio stations also fought over a
finite number of frequencies, which is not
an issue on the web. Businesses, non-profits
and personal pages can co-exist without
scrambling for space. And finally, if a
corporation does get greedy and overstep
its bounds, the Web is an ideal forum for
a David-and-Goliath-style assault.
The media-savvy folks at etoy.com knew
how to bend the power of public opinion
to their advantage. Instead of mounting
a counter-suit or whining to the government,
the group took its case to the people –
holding a press conference at New York’s
Museum of Modern Art, e-mailing Etoys investors
and alerting the online community. Together
with now-renowned anti-corporate crusader
RTMark (pronounced “art mark”),
etoy organized a campaign that pummeled
Etoys and drove down the toy company’s
stock from an all-time high ($60 per share)
to an all-time low ($20) in only two months.
A virtual sit-in by the 1400-strong “toy
army” crippled Etoys’ server
by overloading it with requests (see www.toywar.com).
Etoys’ bottom line, as well as their
reputation, could not weather the storm.
It finally offered to rescind the suit and
pay all court costs – just in time
for their earnings report.
Many are hesitant to call the etoy victory
a rock-solid establishment of democracy
in cyberspace, but it proved that in the
court of popular opinion, justice is swift
and costly. If groups like RTMark and etoy
remain vigilant and refuse to be bought
out (Etoys offered the etoy group $500,000
for their domain name and was turned away.),
the Web could be the first truly egalitarian
form of media.
Return
to Writing |